Bible:
Filter: String:

NT.filter - rwp shoes:

rwp@Acts:13:25 @{As John was fulfilling his course} (\hs eplrou Ians ton dromon\). Imperfect active of \plro\, describing his vivid ministry without defining the precise period when John asked the question. Paul uses this word \dromos\ (course) of his own race (Acts:20:24; strkjv@2Timothy:4:7|). {What suppose ye that I am?} (\Ti eme huponoeite einai?\) Note \ti\ (neuter), not \tina\ (masculine), {what} not {who}, character, not identity. It is indirect discourse (the infinitive \einai\ and the accusative of general reference). {Huponoe} (\hupo, noe\) is to think secretly, to suspect, to conjecture. {I am not he} (\ouk eimi eg\). These precise words are not given in the Gospels, but the idea is the same as the disclaimers by the Baptist in strkjv@John:1:19-27| (cf. also strkjv@Matthew:3:11; strkjv@Mark:1:7; strkjv@Luke:3:16|). Paul had a true grasp of the message of the Baptist. He uses the very form \lsai\ (first aorist active infinitive of \lu\) found in strkjv@Mark:1:7; strkjv@Luke:3:16| and the word for shoes (\hupodma\, singular) in all three. His quotation is remarkably true to the words in the Synoptic Gospels. How did Paul get hold of the words of the Baptist so clearly?

rwp@Ephesians:6:11 @{Put on} (\endusasthe\). Like strkjv@3:12|. See also strkjv@4:24|. {The whole armour} (\tn panoplian\). Old word from \panoplos\ (wholly armed, from \pan, hoplon\). In N.T. only strkjv@Luke:11:22; strkjv@Ephesians:6:11,13|. Complete armour in this period included "shield, sword, lance, helmet, greaves, and breastplate" (Thayer). Our "panoply." Polybius gives this list of Thayer. Paul omits the lance (spear). Our museums preserve specimens of this armour as well as the medieval coat-of-mail. Paul adds girdle and shoes to the list of Polybius, not armour but necessary for the soldier. Certainly Paul could claim knowledge of the Roman soldier's armour, being chained to one for some three years. {That ye may be able to stand} (\pros to dunasthai hums stnai\). Purpose clause with \pros to\ and the infinitive (\dunasthai\) with the accusative of general reference (\hums\) and the second aorist active infinitive \stnai\ (from \histmi\) dependent on \dunasthai\. Against (\pros\). Facing. Another instance of \pros\ meaning "against" (Colossians:2:23|). {The wiles of the devil} (\tas methodias tou diabolou\). See already strkjv@4:14| for this word. He is a crafty foe and knows the weak spots in the Christian's armour.

rwp@Luke:10:11 @{Even the dust} (\kai ton koniorton\). Old word from \konis\, dust, and \ornumi\, to stir up. We have seen it already in strkjv@Matthew:10:14; strkjv@Luke:9:5|. Dust is a plague in the east. Shake off even that. {Cleaveth} (\kollthenta\). First aorist passive participle of \kolla\, to cling as dust and mud do to shoes. Hence the orientals took off the sandals on entering a house. {We wipe off} (\apomassometha\). Middle voice of an old verb \apomass\, to rub off with the hands. Nowhere else in the N.T. But \ekmass\, occurs in strkjv@Luke:7:38,44|. {Against you} (\Humin\). Fine example of the dative of disadvantage (the case of personal interest, the dative).

rwp@Luke:15:22 @{The best robe} (\stoln tn prtn\). \Stol\ is an old word for a fine stately garment that comes down to the feet (from \stello\, to prepare, equip), the kind worn by kings (Mark:16:5; strkjv@Luke:22:46|). Literally, "a robe the first." But not the first that you find, but the first in rank and value, the finest in the house. This in contrast with his shabby clothes. {A ring} (\daktulion\). Common in classical writers and the LXX, but here only in the N.T. From \daktulos\, finger. See \chrusodaktulios\ in strkjv@James:2:2|. {Shoes} (\hupodmata\). Sandals, "bound under." Both sandals and ring are marks of the freeman as slaves were barefooted.

rwp@Mark:6:9 @{Shod with sandals} (\hupodedemenous sandalia\). Perfect passive participle in the accusative case as if with the infinitive \poreuesthai\ or \poreuthnai\, (to go). Note the aorist infinitive middle, \endusasthai\ (text of Westcott and Hort), but \endussthe\ (aorist middle subjunctive) in the margin. Change from indirect to direct discourse common enough, not necessarily due to "disjointed notes on which the Evangelist depended" (Swete). strkjv@Matthew:10:10| has "nor shoes" (\mde hupodmata\), possibly preserving the distinction between "shoes" and "sandals" (worn by women in Greece and by men in the east, especially in travelling). But here again extra shoes may be the prohibition. See on ¯Matthew:10:10| for this. {Two coats} (\duo chitnas\). Two was a sign of comparative wealth (Swete). The mention of "two" here in all three Gospels probably helps us to understand that the same thing applies to shoes and staff. "In general, these directions are against luxury in equipment, and also against their providing themselves with what they could procure from the hospitality of others" (Gould).